ReviewExpert opinion on pharmacotherapy2025
Pharmacological and behavioral pain treatment strategies for patients with opioid use disorder.
Review in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA critical challenge in providing effective medical care for individuals in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for opioid use disorder is the effective management of acute and chronic pain. While pain commonly co-occurs with opioid use disorder, there is limited research to guide effective management of pain in this population. AREAS COVERED: We first provide an overview of the etiology and treatment of acute and chronic pain, highlighting areas of complexity for patients receiving OAT. We then describe the search strategy, which involved a date-inclusive search for relevant terms in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. After summarizing the results of this search on the evidence for pharmacological and behavioral treatments of acute and chronic pain for individuals on OAT, we conclude with a discussion of these findings and a summarized expert opinion on the state of the evidence. EXPERT OPINION: The evidence suggests that while research on effective treatment of acute and chronic pain in individuals in OAT is limited, promising work is ongoing to translate existing treatments, particularly behavioral treatments for chronic pain, to support this population. However, further research is warranted, particularly regarding pharmacological options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.