Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366716›Full record

ArticleMemory (Hove, England)2025

Prediction of information value influences memory: the effect of predicted and assigned value on memory.

Amber Kai Xuan Gan, Mary C Whatley, Alan D Castel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory (Hove, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amber Kai Xuan GanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-3713-8315
Mary C WhatleyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3609-5630
Alan D CastelDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1965-8227

Funding

Goals and Motivation to Remember Important Information in Old AgeR01AG044335 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CASTEL, ALAN D · 2013 to 2025
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tend to prioritise more valuable information at the expense of less valuable information to optimise the use of our limited memory capacity. Participants better remember information that they judge to be valuable and that they are told is valuable. Using a recognition paradigm, we sought to examine whether predicting the value of art pieces before learning the experimenter assigned value would influence memory and the quality of retrieval. In two experiments, participants made value predictions about various art pieces and then learned the assigned value. At test, participants provided old/new and remember/know judgments and were tested on the exact value. Results revealed that participants' value predictions influenced memory to a greater degree than assigned value, despite assigned value indicating the amount of reward participants would receive. We discuss these findings with regard to strategic and automatic influences of value on memory, as well as in the context of reward prediction errors (a difference in expected and actual reward).

Indexed as

MemoryRecognition, PsychologyRewardAdultFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMental RecallYoung Adultmetacognitionrecognitionreward prediction errorsValue-directed remembering

Identifiers

PMID40366716
PMCPMC12172540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.