Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366658›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Long-Term Oncologic Outcome of Breast-Conserving Treatment in Patients With Breast Cancer With BRCA Variants.

Janghee Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Hong Kyu Kim, Hyung Seok Park, Byeongju Kang, Sung Gwe Ahn, Min Sung Chung, Seon-Hi Shin, Junwon Go, Sanghwa Kim and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Breast-Conserving Surgery inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Janghee LeeDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jai Min RyuDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong Kyu KimBreast Care Center, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyung Seok ParkDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byeongju KangDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Sung Gwe AhnDepartment of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Sung ChungDepartment of Surgery, Hanyang University Medical Center, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seon-Hi ShinBiostatistical Consulting and Research Laboratory, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Junwon GoBiostatistical Consulting and Research Laboratory, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sanghwa KimDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Eun Young KimDepartment of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Joon KangDepartment of Surgery, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Sun Young MinDepartment of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Moohyun LeeDepartment of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Eunju ShinDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jisoo ShinDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sae Byul LeeDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chihwan David ChaDepartment of Surgery, Hanyang University Medical Center, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with sporadic breast cancer have comparable prognoses after undergoing either breast-conserving treatment (BCT) or mastectomy. However, there are limited and inconsistent data on the assessment of oncologic outcomes between BCT and mastectomy in patients with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Objective: To investigate the outcomes of BCT on recurrence and survival in patients with breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed patients from 13 institutions in South Korea with primary breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants who underwent either BCT or mastectomy from January 2008 through December 2015. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 8.3 (6.4-9.6) years. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to August 2024. Exposure: BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant and BCT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were logoregional recurrence-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) using the greedy nearest neighbor method was performed to match covariates to minimize potential selection bias. Results: A total of 575 female patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants were identified, all of whom were South Korean with a mean (SD) age of 42.0 (9.7) years. Among them, 367 patients (66.2%) received BCT and 186 (33.8%) were treated with mastectomy. BCT was not a factor associated with oncologic outcomes, including locoregional recurrence, compared with mastectomy. After adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics through 1:1 PSM, there were still no statistically significant differences in oncologic outcomes between the BCT group and the mastectomy group. Multivariate analysis showed that the type of breast surgery was not significantly associated with oncologic outcomes. In subgroup analysis among matched patients based on BRCA1 or BRCA2 status, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, and subtype, BCT was also not a factor associated with risk for recurrence. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings from this cohort study of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants suggested that there were no significant differences in oncologic outcomes between patients who underwent BCT and those who underwent mastectomy. Therefore, breast conservation with close surveillance can be considered a viable treatment option for BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Further studies incorporating prospectively collected data are warranted to validate our findings.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsMastectomy, SegmentalAdultFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID40366658
PMCPMC12079291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.