Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366656›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Practice Facilitation to Support Primary Care Physicians With COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jennifer Shuldiner, Noor-Ul-Huda Shah, Stacey Bar-Ziv, David M Kaplan, Michael E Green, Ravninder Bahniwal, Isaac I Bogoch, Dominik Alex Nowak, Laura Desveaux, Monica Taljaard and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05099497 (Big Data and Little Behaviours), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05099497 nacompletednot on this map

Big Data and Little Behaviours: Feedback and Quality Improvement Supports to Primary Care to Facilitate COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled600ConditionsCovid19 Vaccination, Vaccine UptakeArmsUsing Practice Facilitators to Support Physicians
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jennifer ShuldinerResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Noor-Ul-Huda ShahResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stacey Bar-ZivOntario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David M KaplanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael E GreenDepartments of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Ravninder BahniwalResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Isaac I BogochDepartment of and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Dominik Alex NowakDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura DesveauxResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Monica TaljaardClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Holly O WittemanDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Aisha LoftersResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara KiranDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joe MautiOntario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simran GillResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Archchun AriyarajahResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jawad ChishtieResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Denis TsangResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TradrousResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel WarshafskyOffice of the Chief Medical Officer of Health.
Jia HuDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Sabina Vohra-MillerDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Noah IversResearch and Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Recommendations by family physicians are associated with uptake of vaccines, but many family physicians had limited capacity to identify patients in their practice who might benefit from personalized vaccination counselling. Practice facilitation is an evidence-based method of supporting changes in primary care, but its role in supporting COVID-19 vaccination rates is unknown. Objective: To determine whether a multicomponent practice facilitation intervention would increase COVID-19 vaccine rates in the practices of family physicians with the largest number of unvaccinated patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-arm cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 15, 2021, to March 15, 2022, in Ontario, Canada's most populous province. Data were obtained from the provincial vaccine registry and were linked to routinely used administrative databases. Six hundred family physicians whose practices had the largest number of unvaccinated rostered patients in the province were randomized 1:1 to a practice facilitation intervention or a control group. Eighteen were excluded because they were not practicing family physicians. Follow-up was completed March 31, 2022, and data were analyzed from March 2023 to May 2024. The primary analysis was by intention-to-treat; unit of analysis was the patient. Intervention: Practice facilitators offered physicians support to identify, reach out to, and counsel their unvaccinated patients. Main Outcomes and Measures: Any vaccine dose during a 4-month follow-up interval among rostered patients older than 12 years was used to calculate the rate of doses per 100 patients. A modified robust Poisson regression method was used to analyze intervention effects; intervention effect was estimated as relative risk (RR) using least square means differences with 95% CIs. Results: Of 582 physicians included in the analysis (median age, 58 [IQR, 52-66] years; 426 [73.2%] male), 292 were randomized to the control arm and 290 to the intervention arm. Only 84 physicians (29.0%) in the intervention arm accepted assistance from a practice facilitator. Mean numbers of doses of COVID-19 vaccines per 100 patients were 49.8 (95% CI, 48.8-50.9) in the intervention arm and 50.2 (95% CI, 49.2-51.2) in the control arm (adjusted RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, practice facilitation to primary care clinics with high numbers of patients unvaccinated against COVID-19 was not associated with significant changes in vaccination uptake. Findings suggest the importance of ensuring that interventions target health services with high levels of both motivation and opportunity for improvement. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05099497.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'VaccinationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40366656
PMCPMC12079287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.