Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366652›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Referral Criteria for Specialist Palliative Care for Patients With Dementia.

Yuchieh Kathryn Chang, Jennifer Philip, Jenny T van der Steen, Lieve Van den Block, Allyn Yin Mei Hum, Pedro E Pérez-Cruz, Carlos Paiva, Masanori Mori, Ping-Jen Chen, Meera R Agar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuchieh Kathryn ChangDepartment of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jennifer PhilipDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.
Jenny T van der SteenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Lieve Van den BlockVUB-UGent End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Allyn Yin Mei HumDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Pedro E Pérez-CruzSección de Medicina Paliativa, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Carlos PaivaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Masanori MoriDivision of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ping-Jen ChenDepartment of Family Medicine and Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Meera R AgarIMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Laura HansonDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Catherine J EvansCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
David HuiDepartment of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with dementia have considerable supportive care needs. Specialist palliative care may be beneficial, but it is unclear which patients are most appropriate for referral and when they should be referred. Objective: To identify a set of consensus referral criteria for specialist palliative care for patients with dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study using 3 rounds of Delphi surveys, an international, multidisciplinary panel of clinicians from 5 continents with expertise in the integration of dementia and palliative care were asked to rate 83 putative referral criteria (generated from a previous systematic review and steering committee discussion). Specialist palliative care was defined as an interdisciplinary team consisting of practitioners with advanced knowledge and skills in palliative medicine offering consultative services for specialist-level palliative care in (nonhospice) inpatient, outpatient, community, and home-based settings. Main Outcomes and Measures: Consensus was defined a priori as at least 70% agreement among experts. A criterion was coded as major if the experts advocated that meeting 1 criterion alone was satisfactory to justify a referral. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 63 invited and eligible panelists, the response rate was 58 (92.1%) in round 1, 58 (92.1%) in round 2, and 60 (95.2%) in round 3. Of the 58 panelists who provided demographic data in round 1, most were aged 40 to 49 years (28 of 58 [48.3%]), and 29 panelists (50%) each were men and women. Panelists achieved consensus on 15 major and 42 minor criteria for specialist palliative care referral. The 15 major criteria were grouped under 5 categories, including dementia type (eg, rapidly progressive dementia), symptom distress (eg, severe physical symptoms), psychosocial factors or decision-making (eg, request for hastened death, assisted suicide, or euthanasia), comorbidities or complications (eg, ≥2 episodes of aspiration pneumonia in the past 12 months); and hospital use (eg, ≥2 hospitalizations within the past 3 months). Conclusions and Relevance: In this Delphi survey study, international experts reached consensus on a range of criteria for referral to specialist palliative care. With testing and validation, these criteria may be used to standardize specialist palliative care access for patients with dementia across various care settings.

Indexed as

DementiaPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationAdultConsensusDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40366652
PMCPMC12079294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.