ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2025
Integrating Transcriptomic and Targeted New Approach Methodologies into a Tiered Framework for Chemical Bioactivity Screening.
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical choices drive toxicogenomic potency estimates: a systematic evaluation of transcriptomic points of departure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- Integrating chemical structure and high-throughput transcriptomics for mechanistically interpretable Tox21 bioactivity prediction.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- "The Dose Makes the Poison": Relevance of Paracelsus's Principle for Modern Chemical Hazard Assessment with New Approach Methodologies.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith thousands of chemicals in commerce and the environment, rapid identification of potential hazards is a critical need. Combining broad molecular profiling with targeted
objectivesWe aimed to link transcriptomic readouts to individual molecular targets and integrate transcriptomic predictions with orthogonal receptor-level assays in a proof-of-concept framework for chemical hazard prioritization.
methodsTranscriptomic profiles generated via TempO-Seq in U-2 OS and HepaRG cell lines were used to develop signatures composed of genes uniquely responsive to reference chemicals for distinct molecular targets. These signatures were applied to 75 reference and 1,126 nonreference chemicals screened via HTTr in both cell lines. Selective bioactivity toward each signature was determined by comparing potency estimates against the bulk of transcriptomic bioactivity for each chemical. Chemicals predicted by transcriptomics were confirmed for target bioactivity and selectivity using available orthogonal assay data from the US Environmental Protection Agency ToxCast program. A subset of 37 selectively acting chemicals from HTTr that did not have sufficient orthogonal data were prospectively tested using one of five receptor-level assays.
resultsOf the 1,126 nonreference chemicals screened, 201 demonstrated selective bioactivity in at least one transcriptomic signature and 57 were confirmed as selective nuclear receptor agonists. Chemicals bioactive for each signature were significantly associated with orthogonal assay bioactivity, and signature-based points-of-departure were equally or more sensitive than biological pathway altering concentrations in 95.4% of signature-prioritized chemicals. Prospective profiling found that 18 of 37 (49%) chemicals without prior orthogonal assay data were bioactive against the predicted receptor. DISCUSSION: Our work demonstrates that integrating transcriptomics with targeted orthogonal assays in a tiered framework can support Next Generation Risk Assessment by informing putative molecular targets and prioritizing chemicals for further testing. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.