Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366647›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2025

Integrating Transcriptomic and Targeted New Approach Methodologies into a Tiered Framework for Chemical Bioactivity Screening.

Jesse D Rogers, Joseph L Bundy, Joshua A Harrill, Richard J Judson, Katie Paul-Friedman, Logan J Everett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analytical choices drive toxicogenomic potency estimates: a systematic evaluation of transcriptomic points of departure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jesse D RogersCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6667-2342
Joseph L BundyCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Joshua A HarrillCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Richard J JudsonCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Katie Paul-FriedmanCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Logan J EverettCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith thousands of chemicals in commerce and the environment, rapid identification of potential hazards is a critical need. Combining broad molecular profiling with targeted

objectivesWe aimed to link transcriptomic readouts to individual molecular targets and integrate transcriptomic predictions with orthogonal receptor-level assays in a proof-of-concept framework for chemical hazard prioritization.

methodsTranscriptomic profiles generated via TempO-Seq in U-2 OS and HepaRG cell lines were used to develop signatures composed of genes uniquely responsive to reference chemicals for distinct molecular targets. These signatures were applied to 75 reference and 1,126 nonreference chemicals screened via HTTr in both cell lines. Selective bioactivity toward each signature was determined by comparing potency estimates against the bulk of transcriptomic bioactivity for each chemical. Chemicals predicted by transcriptomics were confirmed for target bioactivity and selectivity using available orthogonal assay data from the US Environmental Protection Agency ToxCast program. A subset of 37 selectively acting chemicals from HTTr that did not have sufficient orthogonal data were prospectively tested using one of five receptor-level assays.

resultsOf the 1,126 nonreference chemicals screened, 201 demonstrated selective bioactivity in at least one transcriptomic signature and 57 were confirmed as selective nuclear receptor agonists. Chemicals bioactive for each signature were significantly associated with orthogonal assay bioactivity, and signature-based points-of-departure were equally or more sensitive than biological pathway altering concentrations in 95.4% of signature-prioritized chemicals. Prospective profiling found that 18 of 37 (49%) chemicals without prior orthogonal assay data were bioactive against the predicted receptor. DISCUSSION: Our work demonstrates that integrating transcriptomics with targeted orthogonal assays in a tiered framework can support Next Generation Risk Assessment by informing putative molecular targets and prioritizing chemicals for further testing. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16024.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingHazardous SubstancesTranscriptomeCell LineHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansHazardous Substances

Identifiers

PMID40366647
PMCPMC12165737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.