Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366638›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)

Effects of Stimulus Temperature and Skin Hydration Levels on Wetness Perception at the Underarm.

Jade Ward, Emilio Verucchi, Dave Swaile, Katie Parker, Peter R Worsley, Davide Filingeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jade WardThermosenseLab, Skin Sensing Research Group, School of Health Sciences, The University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2304-1342
Emilio VerucchiThermosenseLab, Skin Sensing Research Group, School of Health Sciences, The University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Dave SwaileProcter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Katie ParkerProcter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Peter R WorsleyPressureLab, Skin Sensing Research Group, School of Health Sciences, The University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-5042
Davide FilingeriThermosenseLab, Skin Sensing Research Group, School of Health Sciences, The University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Procter and Gamble Studentship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperiencing wetness on the skin because of sweating or contact with fluids can induce thermal discomfort. Millions of people apply antiperspirant deodorant products to the underarm to minimise this negative experience. However, the mechanisms underpinning wetness perception at the underarm and the influence of underlying stratum corneum hydration remain under investigation. We aimed to evaluate the role of stimulus temperature and skin hydration levels on wetness perception at the underarm in young participants. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen healthy participants (5 M/5 F; 29 ± 7 years) underwent a quantitative sensory test during which they reported the perceived magnitude of wetness perception from a short-duration static application of a cold-wet (i.e., 5°C below local skin temperature), neutral-wet (i.e., equal to local skin temperature) and warm-wet (i.e., 5°C above local skin temperature) stimuli. Wetness perception was assessed on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (0 = dry; 100 = completely wet), with a repeated measures design exploring the effects of overhydration (+21 %) and dehydration (-40 %) of the underarm's skin.

resultsOur results indicated a higher wetness perception (p = 0.012) during the cold-wet (40 mm, 95 % CI: 25, 56) than during the warm-wet (25 mm, 95 % CI: 12, 39), and neutral-wet stimuli (24 mm, 95 % CI: 7, 40). Furthermore, overhydration of the underarm' stratum corneum can lead to an increase in wetness perceptions upon contact with cold-wet stimuli only (mean increase: 20 mm, 95 % CI: 3, 36; p = 0.024; corresponding to 20 % increase).

conclusionOur findings provide novel fundamental insights into the underarm's perceptual responses to wetness, which could inform understanding of the determinants of wet feel associated with periods of sweating and the application of antiperspirant products.

Indexed as

Skin TemperatureThermosensingAdultArmFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSkinSkin Physiological PhenomenaSweatingWettabilityYoung Adultaxillaoverhydrationskinthermal sensationwetness perception

Identifiers

PMID40366638
PMCPMC12077280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.