Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366623›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2025

Infant body composition in a randomised trial of a maternal nutritional supplement during preconception and pregnancy.

Jaz Lyons-Reid, José G B Derraik, Leigh C Ward, Timothy Kenealy, Benjamin B Albert, Jose M Ramos Nieves, Cathriona R Monnard, Mya Thway-Tint, Heidi Nield, Sheila J Barton and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jaz Lyons-ReidLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
José G B DerraikDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1226-1956
Leigh C WardSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Timothy KenealyLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Benjamin B AlbertLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jose M Ramos NievesNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cathriona R MonnardNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mya Thway-TintSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Heidi NieldMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sheila J BartonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sarah El-HeisMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Elizabeth H ThamSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Keith M GodfreyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Shiao-Yng ChanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Wayne S CutfieldLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. w.cutfield@auckland.ac.nz.
NiPPeR Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a multinational randomized controlled trial, we previously showed that maternal supplementation with myo-inositol, probiotics, and micronutrients was associated with reduced incidence of rapid infant weight gain and high body mass index (BMI) at two years among offspring. It was unclear whether these differences in weight gain and body mass were due to reduced adiposity. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there were any differences in body composition.

methodsBody composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy at six weeks, six months, one year, and two years among offspring born to mothers who received a nutritional intervention (n = 268) or control (n = 264) supplement preconception and during pregnancy.

resultsThere were no group-level differences in body composition, except at two years, when fat-free mass was greater among control offspring [adjusted mean difference (aMD) 0.14 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03, 0.25, P = 0.012]. However, there were no differences in mean percentage fat mass (%FM) at any time. In both groups, rapid weight gain [Δ weight > 0.67 standard deviation (SD) from birth to one year] was associated with greater %FM (aMD 2.0% at six months, 2.0% at one year, 1.4% at two years) compared with those who did not have rapid weight gain. Likewise, high BMI (≥ 95 percentile) at two years was associated with greater %FM (aMD 2.5%).

conclusionsA maternal nutritional intervention did not lead to differences in average offspring body composition in the first two years of life. However, fewer offspring from the supplemented group experienced rapid weight gain and high BMI, characterized by greater %FM.

Indexed as

Body CompositionDietary SupplementsMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPreconception CareAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyWeight GainAdiposityBioelectrical impedanceBody weightRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40366623
PMCPMC12103482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.