ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Automated multimodel segmentation and tracking for AR-guided open liver surgery using scene-aware self-prompting.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-contained intraoperative surface acquisition on a mixed-reality headset: a comparison of sensor-based and learning-based reconstruction.Research square · 2026Article
- Towards a zero-shot low-latency navigation for open surgery augmented reality applications.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe introduce a multimodel, real-time semantic segmentation and tracking approach for Augmented Reality (AR)-guided open liver surgery. Our approach leverages foundation models and scene-aware re-prompting strategies to balance segmentation accuracy and inference time as required for real-time AR-assisted surgery applications.
methodsOur approach integrates a domain-specific RGBD model (ESANet), a foundation model for semantic segmentation (SAM), and a semi-supervised video object segmentation model (DeAOT). Models were combined in an auto-promptable pipeline with a scene-aware re-prompting algorithm that adapts to surgical scene changes. We evaluated our approach on intraoperative RGBD videos from 10 open liver surgeries using a head-mounted AR device. Segmentation accuracy (IoU), temporal resolution (FPS), and the impact of re-prompting strategies were analyzed. Comparisons to individual models were performed.
resultsOur multimodel approach achieved a median IoU of 71% at 13.2 FPS without re-prompting. Performance of our multimodel approach surpasses that of individual models, yielding better segmentation accuracy than ESANet and better temporal resolution compared to SAM. Our scene-aware re-prompting method reaches the DeAOT performance, with an IoU of 74.7% at 11.5 FPS, even when the DeAOT model uses an ideal reference frame.
conclusionOur scene-aware re-prompting strategy provides a trade-off between segmentation accuracy and temporal resolution, thus addressing the requirements of real-time AR-guided open liver surgery. The integration of complementary models resulted in robust and accurate segmentation in a complex, real-world surgical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.