Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366543›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2025

Postphenomenological Study: Using Generative Knowing and Science Fiction for Fostering Speculative Reflection on AI-nudge Experience.

Ahreum Lim, Aliki Nicolaides, Xiaoou Yang, Beshoy Morkos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahreum LimSchool for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, PO Box 876002, Tempe, AZ, 85287-6002, USA. ahreumli@asu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-2194
Aliki NicolaidesDepartment of Lifelong Education, Administration and Policy, College of Education, University of Georgia, U.S.A River's Crossing 417, 850 College Station Rd, Athens, GA, 30605, USA.
Xiaoou YangSchool of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural and Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, USA STEM Research, Building 1 Rm 2036, 302 East Campus Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Beshoy MorkosSchool of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural and Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, USA STEM Research, Building 1 Rm 2036, 302 East Campus Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an evidence-based argument for integrating participatory inquiry practices into AI education, using science fiction films as a primary tool for examining human-technology relationships. Through a media-enhanced co-inquiry approach, facilitators and students first explore the entanglements of human-technology interactions before engaging with AI nudges-productivity prompts introduced during time-constrained, interdependent assembly tasks in an experimental setting. A postphenomenological analysis of focus group interview data reveals that students' collective responses to AI nudges reflect the competitive pedagogical culture of engineering, often reinforcing rigid, task-driven adaptation. However, moments of attunement to material conditions suggest that speculative thinking can serve as a catalyst for renegotiating entrenched norms of engineering rationality. By facilitating the movement of concepts and generating productive friction, speculation disrupts dominant conceptualizations of AI that the engineering community often readily subscribes to. This study highlights the necessity of a cultural shift in engineering education-one that embraces speculative inquiry as a means of fostering sociotechnical reflection and reimagining human-technology relations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEngineeringKnowledgeMotion PicturesScienceTechnologyThinkingCultureFocus GroupsHumansStudentsAI educationCo-inquiryParticipatoryPedagogyPostphenomenologyScience fiction

Identifiers

PMID40366543
PMCPMC12078390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.