Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366531›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Use of a generic Paediatric Patient Reported Outcome Measure (P-PROM) in Routine hospital Outpatient Care for Kids (ROCK): A qualitative exploration of adolescent, caregiver and service provider perspectives (P-PROM ROCK Phase 1).

Renee Jones, Kim Dalziel, Harriet Hiscock, Alexander van Heudsen, Nancy Devlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Qualitative insights from patient/caregivers, and clinicians on routine use of the EQ-5D-Y-5L in clinical paediatric care-results from a pilot feasibility and acceptability trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renee JonesMelbourne Health Economics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. renee.jones@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5332-5226
Kim DalzielMelbourne Health Economics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-8871
Harriet HiscockHealth Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-2770
Alexander van HeudsenMelbourne Health Economics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8055-5450
Nancy DevlinMelbourne Health Economics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-5361

Funding

EuroQol Research Foundation 330-PhD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore patient, caregiver, and service provider perspectives on the implementation of a generic Paediatric Patient Reported Outcome Measure (P-PROM), their perspectives on the EQ-5D-Y-5L, and to consider how these insights can be used to co-design routine use of EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric outpatient care.

methodsIndividual semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescent patients, caregivers, and providers (allied health, nurses, doctors) who had provided or received outpatient care at The Royal Children's Hospital, Australia. Interview transcripts were analysed using framework analysis and subsequent themes were mapped to an acceptability framework.

resultsInterviews were conducted in June and July 2023 with six service providers, five caregivers and three adolescent patients. Despite service provider concerns that generic P-PROMs may be too broad; all were open to their use. Participants did not see value in patients simply completing a generic P-PROM; it was emphasised that such information needed to be used and responded to. Participants were largely supportive of using the EQ-5D-Y-5L in clinical care, although some were concerned about the short recall period and negative framing. Displaying EQ-5D-Y-5L responses by item was preferred by participants. These different perspectives were summarised into enablers and barriers of acceptability.

conclusionsPerspectives gathered from this study highlight that generic P-PROMs, such as EQ-5D-Y-5L, may have potential for use in paediatric outpatient care. However, to have a meaningful impact, careful consideration is needed regarding implementation. Results have informed co-design of the P-PROM ROCK Program.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareCaregiversPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAustraliaChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical practiceEQ-5D-Y-5LImplementationPatient reported outcome measuresPediatricsPROMsQualitativeQuality of careQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID40366531
PMCPMC12274235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.