Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366469›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association2025

Patient safety attitude among intensive care unit physicians and nurses: a multi-center study in Egypt.

Taghareed A Elhoseny, Mohamed A Kandil, Rasha A Mosallam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taghareed A ElhosenyDepartment of Health Administration and Behavioural Sciences, High Institute of Public Health, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. hiph.taghreedabbas@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-4552
Mohamed A KandilDepartment of Emergency Medical Care, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Rasha A MosallamDepartment of Health Administration and Behavioural Sciences, High Institute of Public Health, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous safety culture assessment, especially in high-risk areas as the intensive care unit (ICU) is one of the requirements for patient safety. This study aimed to assess patient safety attitude in the intensive care units of four public hospitals in Egypt, compare it with benchmarking data, and identify opportunities for improvement.

methodsA cross-sectional design was used. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was distributed in March 2024 to a total of 543 physicians and nurses involved in direct patient care in eight ICU of four public hospitals. A response rate of 85% was achieved (65.12% for physicians and 89.28% for nurses). Safety culture score (ranges from 0 to 100) and percent-positive scores (percentage of respondents with a mean score of > 75 where 100 is best) were calculated according to the tool scoring key. The scores were also compared with the benchmarking scores.

resultsThe overall mean scale score was 63.7 ± 13.4 and the percentage of positive responses was 58.1%. Job satisfaction was the dimension with the highest total mean and percentage of positive responses (70.0 and 65.1%, respectively). On the other hand, stress recognition was the dimension with the lowest mean score and percentage of positive responses (59.4 ± 23.8 and 53.6%, respectively). Physicians attained a significantly higher total mean scale score for the teamwork climate, job satisfaction, perceptions of management and work conditions dimensions compared to nurses (73.8 ± 10.4, 81.7 ± 14.6, 72.5 ± 19.4, 70.6 ± 18.1 for physicians compared to 61.0 ± 15.4, 68.4 ± 23.0, 60.8 ± 22.4, 61.8 ± 22.3 for nurses, respectively) (p < 0.05) while "stress recognition'' was significantly higher among nurses (mean scale score for nurses was 60.4 ± 23.6, p < 0.05 compared to 52.0 ± 24.0, p < 0.05 for physicians). The dimensions "teamwork climate'', "safety climate'' and "stress recognition'' attained lower scores in the current study compared to the benchmark data.

conclusionThe dimensions "teamwork climate'', "safety climate'', and "stress recognition'' attained relatively low scores which calls for interventions such as team trainings, limitation of work hours and senior executive safety rounds. Physicians had significantly higher scores than nurses in four out of six domains which needs further research to identify the reasons and plan the appropriate improvement strategies. Future studies should track changes over time.

Indexed as

EgyptICU physicians and nursesIntensive care unit staffPatient safetySafety Attitudes QuestionnaireSafety culture

Identifiers

PMID40366469
PMCPMC12078733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.