ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025
A novel composite model for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal diagnostic network integrating infrared and mass spectra for lung cancer.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- LungPanelNet: a machine learning-based approach for the early prediction and differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that a four-protein marker panel (4MP), consisting of Pro-SFTPB, CA125, Cyfra21-1, and CEA could be used to identify benign and malignant lung nodules. This study aims to improve the 4MP's performance by combining clinical characteristics and low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) screening features. This study involved 380 patients with pulmonary nodules, diagnosing 91 benign and 289 early-stage lung cancer via postoperative histopathology. Serum levels of Pro-SFTPB, CA125, Cyfra21-1, and CEA were assessed using an immunofluorescence assay. Clinical features were selected using the LassoCV method. A new diagnostic model was developed using logistic regression, incorporating 4MP, clinical characteristics, and LDCT features. The model's diagnostic performance was compared to the lung cancer biomarker panel (LCBP) nodule risk model, and evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, and the AUC value. The AUC values for distinguishing between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules were 0.612 for the 4MP model. We screened out 7 factors of patient clinical information and CT features of nodules. The composite model (4MP + age + gender + BMI + family history of cancer + nodule size + nodule margin + nodule density) achieved an AUC of 0.808, especially for small nodules (AUC = 0.835 for nodules ≤ 6 mm). Furthermore, within the same validation cohort, the performance of the composite model (AUC = 0.680) surpassed that of the LCBP nodule risk model (AUC = 0.599). The novel composite model accurately diagnoses malignant pulmonary nodules, especially small ones, helping to stratify patients by lung cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.