Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366455›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025

A novel composite model for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.

Lei Zhang, Yanhui Xu, Qinqin Lou, Fangfang Chen, Fang Li, Kun Chai, Junshun Gao, Mingjie Tong, Yan Ma, Lilong Xia and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lei ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310013, China.
Yanhui XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310013, China.
Qinqin LouHangzhou Cosmos Wisdom Mass Spectrometry Center of Zhejiang University Medical School, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Fangfang ChenHangzhou Cosmos Wisdom Mass Spectrometry Center of Zhejiang University Medical School, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Fang LiHangzhou Cosmos Wisdom Mass Spectrometry Center of Zhejiang University Medical School, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Kun ChaiHangzhou Cosmos Wisdom Mass Spectrometry Center of Zhejiang University Medical School, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Junshun GaoHangzhou Cosmos Wisdom Mass Spectrometry Center of Zhejiang University Medical School, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Mingjie TongHangzhou Cosmos Wisdom Mass Spectrometry Center of Zhejiang University Medical School, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Yan MaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310013, China.
Lilong XiaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310013, China.
Kaixiang ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310013, China.
Junli GaoHangzhou Cosmos Wisdom Mass Spectrometry Center of Zhejiang University Medical School, Hangzhou, 311200, China. gjl_818@zuaa.zju.edu.cn.
Xinhai ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310013, China. dr-zxh@163.com.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project 2022PY035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that a four-protein marker panel (4MP), consisting of Pro-SFTPB, CA125, Cyfra21-1, and CEA could be used to identify benign and malignant lung nodules. This study aims to improve the 4MP's performance by combining clinical characteristics and low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) screening features. This study involved 380 patients with pulmonary nodules, diagnosing 91 benign and 289 early-stage lung cancer via postoperative histopathology. Serum levels of Pro-SFTPB, CA125, Cyfra21-1, and CEA were assessed using an immunofluorescence assay. Clinical features were selected using the LassoCV method. A new diagnostic model was developed using logistic regression, incorporating 4MP, clinical characteristics, and LDCT features. The model's diagnostic performance was compared to the lung cancer biomarker panel (LCBP) nodule risk model, and evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, and the AUC value. The AUC values for distinguishing between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules were 0.612 for the 4MP model. We screened out 7 factors of patient clinical information and CT features of nodules. The composite model (4MP + age + gender + BMI + family history of cancer + nodule size + nodule margin + nodule density) achieved an AUC of 0.808, especially for small nodules (AUC = 0.835 for nodules ≤ 6 mm). Furthermore, within the same validation cohort, the performance of the composite model (AUC = 0.680) surpassed that of the LCBP nodule risk model (AUC = 0.599). The novel composite model accurately diagnoses malignant pulmonary nodules, especially small ones, helping to stratify patients by lung cancer risk.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleAdultAgedAntigens, NeoplasmCA-125 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansKeratin-19MaleMiddle AgedROC Curveantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenKeratin-19Clinical characteristicsComposite modelFour-protein marker panelLung cancerPulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID40366455
PMCPMC12078401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.