ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Fenfluramine: an effective treatment for developmental epileptic encephalopathies beyond Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut Syndromes.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fenfluramine in Rett syndrome: A multidimensional clinical study.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Observational
- Adjunctive Fenfluramine in Adults with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Effectiveness and Tolerability in Real-World Clinical Practice.CNS drugs · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFenfluramine (FFA) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) with effectiveness in Dravet Syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), but unknown effectiveness in other developmental epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs).
methodsThis multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of FFA in children with DS, LGS and other DEEs within clinical practice. Data were extracted from patients' charts before and up to 6 months after treatment.
resultsFifty-four patients (median age 10 years; 67% male) with DS (n = 17), LGS (n = 20), or other DEE (n = 17) were included. At three months following FFA treatment, the proportion of responders (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency) was significantly higher in patients with DS (94%) compared with LGS (50%; p = 0.003) and other DEEs (47%; p = 0.003). No significant difference in responder rates was observed between the LGS and other DEE groups. FFA efficacy was independent of dosage, concomitant ASMs, epilepsy duration, etiology, or specific comorbidities. FFA demonstrated effectiveness across all seizure types, with particular efficacy in tonic-clonic seizures. Responders experienced improvements in physician-assessed seizure intensity; 56-91% showed improvements in other Clinical Global Impression domains, including cognition, behavior, sleep, and seizure severity. Adverse events occurred in 56% of patients and were predominantly mild, with somnolence, anorexia, and irritability the most common. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in three patients (1 LGS, 2 other DEEs).
conclusionFFA demonstrates effectiveness and tolerability in patients with DEEs in a real-world setting, and has potential as a broad-spectrum ASM, effective across a wide range of DEEs, seizure types, and patient profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40366453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.