ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Short-term malignancy risk of JAK inhibitors in severe alopecia areata: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updated Integrated Safety Analysis of Ritlecitinib up to ~ 5 Years in Patients with Alopecia Areata from the ALLEGRO Clinical Trial Program.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Trial
- Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Management of Alopecia Areata: An Asia-Pacific Modified Delphi Expert Panel Recommendations.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Scalp Tape-Strip RNA Sequencing Captures Disease Activity and Treatment-Response Signatures in Alopecia Areata.Allergy · 2026Article
- Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Beyond Cytotoxicity: Hair Follicle Immune Privilege Collapse and JAK-STAT Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune hair loss disorder, with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) emerging as an effective treatment. However, concerns about malignancy risk remain due to boxed warnings primarily based on studies in rheumatoid arthritis. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between JAKis and malignancy risk in AA using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. Patients with severe AA were categorized by treatment history, including JAKis, traditional immunosuppressants, and no systemic treatment. Propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards models assessed the risks of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)/basal cell carcinoma (BCC), internal malignancies, and hematologic malignancies. Among matched cohorts of 920 patients treated with traditional immunosuppressants and 920 treated with JAKis (mean follow-up: 1,302 and 1,229 days, respectively), SCC/BCC risk was not significantly different (HR = 0.324 [0.065, 1.609]). However, internal malignancy (HR = 4.906 [2.168, 11.101]) and hematologic malignancy (HR = 8.713 [1.104, 68.796]) risks were significantly higher with traditional immunosuppressants. No significant difference in malignancy risk was observed between 446 JAKi-treated and 446 untreated patients. These findings align with previous meta-analyses in autoimmune diseases, which have not linked JAKis to an increased malignancy risk. While this study found no evidence that JAKis elevate malignancy risk, the role of JAK-STAT signaling in cancer remains complex. Given AA's unclear baseline malignancy risk and this study's retrospective nature and limited follow-up, longer-term studies are needed to better understand the long-term safety of JAKis in AA and refine risk assessment and screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40366436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.