ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Pictorial review of bilateral adnexal lesions.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bilateral adnexal lesions involve structures such as the ovaries, fallopian tubes, and surrounding tissues, arising from diverse etiologies, including inflammatory, infectious, neoplastic, and functional causes. Their variable presentation poses a diagnostic challenge in clinical practice, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach for accurate assessment and management. The American College of Radiology (ACR) introduced the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) as a standardized lexicon and risk stratification tool for evaluating adnexal lesions via ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). While MRI is the most accurate modality for assessing indeterminate adnexal masses, bilateral lesions frequently present diagnostic dilemmas, particularly when they exhibit divergent O-RADS classifications or arise from different etiologies. The O-RADS system does not provide specific guidelines for bilateral lesions, requiring independent classification of each lesion, with management dictated by the highest assigned category. Certain pathologies demonstrate a propensity for bilateral involvement, underscoring the importance of recognizing their imaging characteristics and differential diagnoses. Integrating this knowledge into diagnostic reports enhances clinical decision-making and optimizes patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40366413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.