ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Predictors and associations of complications in ureteroscopy for stone disease using AI: outcomes from the FLEXOR registry.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a calibrated logistic regression clinical risk score for predicting postoperative sepsis following retrograde intrarenal surgery.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Prediction model for additional procedure requirement in flexible ureterorenoscopy using explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging laboratory biomarkers to predict urosepsis after upper urinary tract stone surgery: an explainable machine learning approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- The impact of normalized energy utilization on clinical outcomes and complications in endourological stone surgery: a prospective study.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Comment on "predictors and associations of complications in ureteroscopy for stone disease using AI: outcomes from the FLEXOR registry".Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Digital twins in urology: a vision for the future of urological practice.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to develop machine learning(ML) algorithms to evaluate complications of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy(fURSL), providing a valid predictive model. 15 ML algorithms were trained on a large number fURSL data from > 6500 patients from the international FLEXOR database. fURSL complications included pelvicalyceal system(PCS) bleeding, ureteric/PCS injury, fever and sepsis. Pre-treatment characteristics served as input for ML training and testing. Correlation and logistic regression analysis were carried out by a multi-task neural network, while explainable AI was used for the predictive model. ML algorithms performed excellently. For intraoperative PCS bleeding, Extra Tree Classifier achieved the best accuracy at 95.03% (precision 80.99%), and greatest correlation with stone diameter(0.21) and residual fragments(0.26). PCS injury was best predicted by RandomForest (accuracy 97.72%, precision 63.50%). XGBoost performed best for ureteric injury (accuracy 96.88%, precision 60.67%). Both demonstrated moderate correlation with preoperative characteristics. Postoperative fever was predicted by Extra Tree Classifier with 91.34% accuracy (precision 58.20%). Cat Boost Classifier predicted postoperative sepsis with 99.15% accuracy (precision 66.38%), and the best overall performance. At logistic regression, postoperative fever/sepsis positively correlated with preoperative urine culture(p = 0.001). ML represents a powerful tool for automatic prediction of outcomes. Our study showed promises in algorithms training and validation on a very large database of patients treated for urolithiasis, with excellent accuracy for prediction of complications. With further research, reliable predictive nomograms could be created based on ML analysis, to serve as aid to urologists and patients in the decision making and treatment planning process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.