Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366326›Full record

ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2025

Blood Pressure Lowering and Risk of Cancer: Individual Participant-Level Data Meta-Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Studies.

Milad Nazarzadeh, Emma Copland, Karl Smith Byrne, Dexter Canoy, Zeinab Bidel, Mark Woodward, Qianqian Yang, James McKay, Anders Mälarstig, Åsa K Hedman and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent updates and perspectives in "Onco-hypertension".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Milad NazarzadehDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Emma CoplandDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Karl Smith ByrneCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dexter CanoyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Zeinab BidelDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; The George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Qianqian YangDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
James McKayGenomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Anders MälarstigDiscovery Network, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Åsa K HedmanDiscovery Network, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
John ChalmersThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Koon K TeoPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Carl J PepineCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Barry R DavisSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sverre E KjeldsenDepartment of Cardiology, University of Oslo, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Johan SundströmThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kazem RahimiDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kazem.rahimi@wrh.ox.ac.uk.
Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/IPBSRF/22/27060British Heart Foundation PG/18/65/33872World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacologic blood pressure (BP) lowering is typically a lifelong treatment, and both clinicians and patients may have concerns about the long-term use of antihypertensive agents and the risk for cancer. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effect of long-term pharmacologic BP lowering on the risk for new-onset cancer is limited, with most knowledge derived from observational studies.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess whether long-term BP lowering affects the risk for new-onset cancer, cause-specific cancer death, and selected site-specific cancers.

methodsIndividual-level data from 42 RCTs were pooled using a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis. The primary outcome was incident cancer of all types, and secondary outcomes were cause-specific cancer death and selected site-specific cancers. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the heterogeneity of the BP-lowering effect by baseline variables and over follow-up time. Cox proportional hazards regression, stratified by trial, was used for the statistical analysis. For site-specific cancers, analyses were complemented with Mendelian randomization, using naturally randomized genetic variants associated with BP lowering to mimic the design of a long-term RCT.

resultsData from 314,016 randomly allocated participants without known cancer at baseline were analyzed. Over a median follow-up of 4 years (Q1-Q3: 3-5 years), 17,954 participants (5.7%) developed cancer, and 4,878 (1.5%) died of cancer. In the individual participant data meta-analysis, no associations were found between reductions in systolic or diastolic BP and cancer risk (HR per 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.99-1.06]; HR per 3 mm Hg reduction in diastolic BP: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.98-1.07]). No changes in relative risk for incident cancer were observed over follow-up time, nor was there evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effects across baseline subgroups. No effect on cause-specific cancer death was found. For site-specific cancers, no evidence of an effect was observed, except a possible link with lung cancer risk (HR for systolic BP reduction: 1.17; 99.5% CI: 1.02-1.32). Mendelian randomization studies showed no association between systolic or diastolic BP reduction and site-specific cancers, including overall lung cancer and its subtypes.

conclusionsRandomized data analysis provided no evidence to indicate that pharmacologic BP lowering has a substantial impact, either increasing or decreasing, on the risk for incident cancer, cause-specific cancer death, or selected site-specific cancers.

Indexed as

epidemiologygeneticshypertensionischemic diseaselifestyle risk factorslung cancerpreventionrenal cell cancer

Identifiers

PMID40366326
PMCPMC7618006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.