ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2025
Research Communication: Real-World Effectiveness of Budesonide Orodispersible Tablets for Eosinophilic Oesophagitis: The Importance of Patience and Education.
Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maintenance therapy with once or twice daily budesonide orodispersible tablets after budesonide viscous solution in eosinophilic esophagitis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Advances and Challenges in the Development of New and Novel Treatment Strategies for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Budesonide orodispersible tablets (BOT) have been shown to be efficacious for eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) in clinical trials. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of BOT in a retrospective cohort of 94 patients across six tertiary centres. 61% of patients achieved histological remission and 39% clinicohistological remission following induction therapy. Adverse events were reported by 16% of patients and 17% were noted to have incorrect technique of administration. BOT was demonstrated to have lower rates of clinicohistological remission in real-world practice than reported in clinical trials, largely due to incorrect technique and cessation due to adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.