Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366244›Full record

ArticleFlorence Nightingale journal of nursing2025

Nasogastric and Nasoenteric Tube-Related Incidents: A Cohort Study with Hospitalized Brazilian Older Adults.

Roberta Maria de Pina Pereira, Luana Baldin Storti, Maria Angélica Andreotti Diniz, Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes, Claire Nierva Herrera, Luciana Kusumota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Florence Nightingale journal of nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberta Maria de Pina PereiraDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luana Baldin StortiDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Angélica Andreotti DinizDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Raphael Escobar GimenesDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claire Nierva HerreraDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana KusumotaDepartment of General and Specialized Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe natural aging process, aggravated by the presence of disease and other factors, makes older adults more susceptible to the need for nutritional therapy. Patient safety is a worldwide concern, and older adults are one of the age groups at risk for incidents, especially related to the use of nasogastric and nasoenteric tube feeding.

methodsThis prospective cohort study aimed to identify and analyze incidents related to the use of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes, their consequences, and the associated factors in hospitalized older adults. The study was carried out in a public general hospital in the state of São Paulo. Data were collected between October 2016 and November 2017 for this study, and continued until April 2019 in other hospitals involved in the "Multicentre study" through voluntary reporting by healthcare providers, patients or their companions, active searches during ward visits, and reviews of medical records.

resultsThe sample consisted of 86 older adults, with a mean age of 71.33 years, high nursing care dependence (39.53%), and a high risk of death (59.30%). The primary reason for tube use among older adults was sensory decline in health (31.40%), followed by lack of appetite and poor oral diet acceptance (22.09%). The most common insertion technique was blind bedside insertion (45.35%), with gastric positioning being the most frequent (44.18%), according to patient records. The prevalence of incidents was 43.02%, among these 35.14% older adults experienced only one incident, 18.91% had two incidents, and 45.95% had three or more incidents. The unplanned removal of the tube was the most frequent event (28.71%), and 56.44% of the cases resulted in mild harm. The death of older adult patients using NGT/NET was not associated with age, sex, level of consciousness, level of nursing care dependence, risk of death, length of monitoring, length of hospital stays, or total incidents.

conclusionThe level of nursing care dependence and age were associated with the occurrence of incidents, highlighting the urgent need to adopt protocols based on updated scientific evidence to guarantee quality and safe care for hospitalized older adults.

Indexed as

Agedgastrointestinal intubationgeriatric nursingmedical errorspatient safetytube feeding

Identifiers

PMID40366244
PMCPMC12042238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.