Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366243›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy2025

The Impact of

Fatih Tamer, Khayala Mammadli, Ülkem Yararbaş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatih TamerEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5656-9955
Khayala MammadliEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0009-5437-1329
Ülkem YararbaşEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-5293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the relationship of Methods: The clinical and imaging findings of 39 patients who met the diagnostic criteria and underwent Results: The tumour was intrahepatic in 34 patients and extrahepatic in 5 patients. PET/CT detected nodal involvement in 21 patients (53.8%) and distant metastases in 35 patients (89.7%). Fourteen cases (35.9%) had regional-distant metastases detected by PET/CT but not by magnetic resonance imaging/CT, and the stage of the disease changed accordingly. SUV Conclusion: Our results highlight the efficacy of

Indexed as

18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucoseCholangiocellular carcinomapositron emission tomographypositron emission tomography/computed tomographysurvival

Identifiers

PMID40366243
PMCPMC12134965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.