Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2025
Pharmacokinetics and Safety Evaluation of a New Generic Sitafloxacin: A Phase I Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Chinese Participants.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sitafloxacin is a new antibiotic drug belonging to the fourth generation quinolone antibiotics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety profiles, and bioequivalence of test and reference 50-mg sitafloxacin tablets under fasting and fed conditions. The PK parameters, which were calculated with noncompartmental model, including maximum concentration, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity. The bioequivalence was assessed on the basis of whether the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratio for the test/reference drugs fell within the accepted range of 80%-125%. Adverse events were monitored to assess safety. Finally, 80 healthy Chinese participants were enrolled, of which 40 were enrolled in the fasting study and the other 40 enrolled in the fed study. There was 1 participant in the fed trial who withdrew from the study because of failure to finish the high-fat meal. The geometric mean ratio and its 90% confidence interval for the maximum concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, AUC from time 0 to infinity between the branded and generic sitafloxacin, under both fasting and fed conditions, were compliant with the predefined bioequivalence criteria of 80%-125%. No serious adverse events were observed in this study. Therefore, the findings indicate that generic and original sitafloxacin tablets have comparable bioequivalence and safety profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.