Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366118›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2025

Evaluation of ASA, SORT, and ACCI Scores in Predicting the Need for Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Admissions After Hip Surgery.

Neslihan Gezer, Lütfiye Pirbudak, Elzem Şen, Ayşe Mızrak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neslihan GezerGaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9286-4724
Lütfiye PirbudakGaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3474-1056
Elzem ŞenGaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3001-7324
Ayşe MızrakGaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5999-4810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT), and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) scores in determining the requirement for intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in patients aged 65 years and older who underwent hip surgery. Methods: The study population consisted of 450 patients who underwent orthopedic hip surgery. The patients who were admitted to the ICU were either monitored in the postoperative ICU (Group 1) or transferred to the ward (Group 2). SORT and ACCI scores of all patients were recorded. Results: The patients of Group 1 were significantly older than those in Group 2. SORT scores of both groups were comparable. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ACCI scores were determined as 42.1% and 70.8%, respectively. Conclusion: As a conclusion, ACCI scores can predict the need for ICU admissions in patients undergoing hip surgery. Besides, the traditionally used ASA scores are generally higher in this patient group. Determinative criteria for predicting the need for ICU admissions include older age of the patients, presence of comorbidities as hypertension and diabetes mellitus, as well as a long preoperative waiting period.

Indexed as

ACCIASAhip surgeryICU admissionSORT

Identifiers

PMID40366118
PMCPMC12288435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.