Trial reportPharmacotherapy2025
Effect of creatine monohydrate on motor function in children with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.
Trial report in Pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a rare, progressive muscle disease with no available disease-modifying therapy. Creatine monohydrate (CrM) has been shown to improve muscle strength in individuals with muscular dystrophies but has not been tested in young people with FSHD. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of CrM on motor function in children with FSHD.
methodsIn a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial, powdered CrM at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day (maximum 10 g daily) was compared with placebo in two 12-week treatment periods with a 6-week washout between crossover arms. The primary outcome measure was the Motor Function Measure for Neuromuscular Disease (MFM-32) with secondary outcomes assessing safety, endurance, strength, patient-reported outcome measures, and muscle morphology measurements as assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
resultsThirteen children were enrolled (mean (standard deviation, SD) 12.2 (2.67) years of age) and 11 patients completed both trial treatment periods. In an intention-to-treat analysis, no clinically meaningful difference was seen between treatment groups as measured by the mean difference in MFM-32 (0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.71 to 1.08). However, there was an improvement in 6-minute walk distance of 27.74 m (95% CI -1.41 to 56.88) and trends to improvement in the FSHD-Composite Outcome Measure for Pediatrics (FSHD-COM Peds), 10 meter walk/run, and in MRI measures. There were no serious adverse events. Serum creatinine increased by a mean 12.63 μmol/L (95% CI 1.14 to 24.12) post-CrM treatment, though this was presumed to reflect increased creatinine production. No participants discontinued CrM due to adverse events.
conclusionCrM is safe and well tolerated in children with FSHD. Although CrM had no effect on motor function as measured by the MFM-32 compared with placebo, there were trends toward improvement in the 6-minute walk distance and other secondary outcome measures. This study confirms the feasibility of conducting clinical trials in children with FSHD. Further assessment of the efficacy of CrM in pediatric FSHD is warranted in a larger randomized controlled clinical trial. Future studies may benefit from stratifying population cohorts according to functional ability or by MRI fat infiltration measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.