ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Intermediate Habitat Fragmentation Buffers Droughts: How Individual Energy Dynamics Mediate Mammal Community Response to Stressors.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Riding out the storm: Behavioural responses of a large herbivore to high-Arctic winds.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Intermediate Habitat Fragmentation Buffers Droughts: How Individual Energy Dynamics Mediate Mammal Community Response to Stressors.Global change biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biodiversity is threatened by land-use and climate change. Although these processes are known to influence species survival and diversity, predicting their combined effects on communities remains challenging. We here aim to disentangle the combined effects of drought-induced resource shortage and habitat fragmentation on species coexistence. To understand how both fragmentation and droughts affect individual movement and physiology, and ultimately influence population and community dynamics, we use an individual-based metabolic modelling approach to simulate a community of small mammals. Individuals forage in the landscape to ingest energy, which they then allocate to basal maintenance, digestion, locomotion, growth, reproduction, and storage. If individuals of several species are able to balance their energy intake and needs, and additionally store energy as fat reserves, they may overcome stress periods and coexist. We find that species recover best after a drought when they live in moderately fragmented landscapes compared to those with low or high fragmentation. In low fragmented landscapes, high local competition during resource shortages is problematic, while in highly fragmented landscapes, low energy balance and storage often lead to high mortality during drought. Intermediately fragmented landscapes balance these effects and show the least impact of droughts on species richness, a pattern that holds also when integrating observed drought time series from monitoring data in the model simulations. Due to the interacting negative impacts, we suggest that with ongoing global change, it is increasingly important to understand stressors simultaneously to identify measures that support species coexistence and biodiversity. Including individual energy dynamics allowed us to conflate the different global change effects through energy storage and energy allocation to different processes. Our presented community model, which integrates metabolic and behavioural reactions of individuals to different stressors and scales them to the community level, offers valuable insights with great potential to support nature conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.