Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Social Determinants of Health-Related Outcomes in an Intervention Following Initial Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Symptom Experiences and Coping Strategies in Turkish Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Interviews.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisparities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant rates and survival to hospital discharge exist, negatively impacting Black individuals, women, or people with lower socioeconomic status. This study examined if social determinants of health (SDOH) were associated with ICD shocks, all-cause hospitalization, death, or patient-reported outcomes during the first year following an initial ICD.
methodsThis secondary analysis used data from a comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial of a post-ICD patient intervention. Participants were followed for 1 year, and outcomes included ICD shocks, hospitalizations, death, physical function, psychological adjustment, and self-efficacy. SDOH indicators included age, biological sex, race and ethnicity, education level, employment status, household income, and rural/urban residence. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's
resultsParticipants (N=301) were aged 64±12 years; 1% Asian/Pacific Islander, 4% Black, 2% Latinx, 2% Native American/Alaskan, and 91% White; 74% men; 87% urban residents; 65% retired/disabled/unemployed; 45% household income <$50 000/year; and 48% high school/vocational education or less. No significant associations were observed between SDOH and ICD shocks, hospitalization, or death. Physical health improved less for individuals with household income <$50 000 (
conclusionsSDOH were not associated with the incidence of ICD shocks, hospitalization, or death in the first year after receipt of an initial ICD. There were limited differences in the change in patient-reported outcomes over time by SDOH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.