Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365768›Full record

SynthesisClinical cardiology2025

Safety and Efficacy of Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hamza Ashraf, Zain Ali Nadeem, Khawaja Abdul Rehman, Shanzay Akhtar, Haider Ashfaq, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Mahad Butt, Ibrahim Nagmeldin, Eeshal Fatima, Muhammad Waqas and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hamza AshrafDepartment of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9121-6091
Zain Ali NadeemDepartment of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5968-4538
Khawaja Abdul RehmanDepartment of Medicine, CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2150-4489
Shanzay AkhtarDepartment of Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5796-9132
Haider AshfaqDepartment of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4372-9929
Muhammad Sohaib KhanDepartment of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mahad ButtDepartment of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7099-3380
Ibrahim NagmeldinDepartment of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3331-8138
Eeshal FatimaDepartment of Medicine, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7103-9364
Muhammad WaqasDepartment of Medicine, Wah Medical College, Wah, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5050-9602
Aalaa SalehFaculty of Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9046-3003
Hritvik JainDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5608-4299
Raheel AhmedNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-7314

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infection requiring prolonged intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) has emerged as an alternative to prolonged hospitalization, but its safety and efficacy in IE remain debated. HYPOTHESIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes of OPAT in IE patients.

methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies assessing OPAT in IE. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting at least one relevant outcome (mortality, relapse, readmission, valve surgery, and adverse events). Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool.

resultsA total of 25 studies involving 2654 patients were included in the analysis. Patients treated with OPAT had a mortality rate of 0% during the treatment period and 5% during follow-up. The readmission rate was 16% during the treatment period, 4% of the patients had relapse, while 16% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. During follow-up, the readmission rate was 19%, with a relapse rate of 2%, and 14% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. Sensitivity analyses did not significantly affect the results, highlighting the robustness of the findings.

conclusionOPAT appears to be safe and effective for IE patients, with low mortality and relapse rates. However, increased readmission rates and IV-line complications warrant careful patient selection and monitoring. Further prospective trials are needed to refine OPAT protocols.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsEndocarditisHumansInfusions, IntravenousInfusions, ParenteralPatient ReadmissionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticsinfective endocarditisOPAToutpatientparenteral therapy

Identifiers

PMID40365768
PMCPMC12076119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.