SynthesisClinical cardiology2025
Safety and Efficacy of Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saving Beds and Budgets: Real-World Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacoeconomics of Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides (LALs) in a Day Hospital Setting.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Insurance Status and Quality of Care in Infective Endocarditis: A National Analysis of Disparities in Length of Stay, Discharge, and Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patients referred to but not taken on to an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service: the impact of infection specialist advice on the assessment and clinical outcomes.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- [Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: challenges and opportunities].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Beyond antibiotic prophylaxis: A scoping review of infective endocarditis prevention in the device era.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infection requiring prolonged intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) has emerged as an alternative to prolonged hospitalization, but its safety and efficacy in IE remain debated. HYPOTHESIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes of OPAT in IE patients.
methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies assessing OPAT in IE. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting at least one relevant outcome (mortality, relapse, readmission, valve surgery, and adverse events). Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool.
resultsA total of 25 studies involving 2654 patients were included in the analysis. Patients treated with OPAT had a mortality rate of 0% during the treatment period and 5% during follow-up. The readmission rate was 16% during the treatment period, 4% of the patients had relapse, while 16% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. During follow-up, the readmission rate was 19%, with a relapse rate of 2%, and 14% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. Sensitivity analyses did not significantly affect the results, highlighting the robustness of the findings.
conclusionOPAT appears to be safe and effective for IE patients, with low mortality and relapse rates. However, increased readmission rates and IV-line complications warrant careful patient selection and monitoring. Further prospective trials are needed to refine OPAT protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.