ArticleMuscle & nerve2025
A Preliminary Investigation of Acoustic Features for Remote Monitoring of Respiration in ALS.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of respiratory decline in neuromuscular disorders.Respiratory medicine · 2026Review
- Acoustic Features in ALS: Taking a Pause to Appreciate a Novel Remote Respiratory Monitoring Strategy.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsThere is a substantial need to establish reliable approaches for low-burden at-home monitoring of respiratory function for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PALS). This preliminary study assessed the potential of acoustic features extracted from a smartphone passage reading task to serve as clinically meaningful outcome measures reflecting instrumental and self-reported respiratory function measures.
methodsThirty-six PALS completed an in-clinic slow vital capacity (SVC) task, followed by at-home completion of surveys and audio recording of a reading passage using a smartphone application. Speaking rate and pause features were extracted offline. Correlation analysis evaluated the relationship between the acoustic features and both instrumental (SVC) and self-reported (respiratory subscale of the self-entry version of the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised; ALSFRS-RSE) measures of respiratory function. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) with area under the curve (AUC) analysis evaluated the utility of acoustic features for classifying participants with and without respiratory involvement.
resultsSVC and respiratory self-ratings were significantly correlated with pause, but not rate, measures. Percent pause time was the most strongly correlated acoustic feature with both SVC (r = -0.62) and ALSFRS-RSE respiratory subscale ratings (r = -0.43). ROC analysis revealed that percent pause time classified participants presenting with respiratory involvement based on instrumentation (SVC < 70% predicted [AUC = 0.70]; SVC < 50% predicted [AUC = 0.88]) and self-ratings when using the respiratory ALSFRS-RSE score cut-off of < 11 (AUC = 0.78), but not < 12 (AUC = 0.61). DISCUSSION: Percent pause time, extracted from a smartphone-recorded passage reading, offers a promising index for remote assessment and monitoring of respiratory function in PALS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.