Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365744›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Nectar metabolomes contribute to pollination syndromes.

Fiona T MacNeill, Sarah G Hunter, Felicity Muth, Brian E Sedio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona T MacNeillDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 2415 Speedway, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8875-5330
Sarah G HunterDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 2415 Speedway, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-4903
Felicity Muth *Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 2415 Speedway, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-0589
Brian E Sedio *Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 2415 Speedway, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-9822

Funding

Stengl-Wyer Endowment Grant SWG-21-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Pollination syndromes', where convergent floral signals reflect selection from a functional pollinator group, are often characterized by physical features, yet floral rewards such as nectar may also reflect selection from pollinators. We asked whether nectar chemistry shows evidence of convergence across functional pollinator groups, i.e. a 'chemical pollination syndrome'. We used untargeted metabolomics to compare nectar and leaf chemical profiles across 19 bee- and bird-syndrome species, focusing on Salvia spp. (Lamiaceae), selected to maximize switching events between pollination syndromes. We found that independently derived bird-syndrome nectar showed convergence on nectar traits distinct from bee-syndrome nectar, primarily driven by the composition and concentration of alkaloid profiles. We did not find evidence for 'passive leaking' of nectar compounds from leaves since metabolite abundances were uncorrelated across tissues and many nectar metabolites were not present in leaves. Nectar and leaf metabolomes were strongly decoupled from phylogenetic relationships within Salvia. These results suggest that functional pollinator groups may drive the evolution of floral reward chemistry, consistent with our 'chemical pollination syndrome' hypothesis and indicative of selection by pollinators, but we also consider alternative explanations. In addition, our results support the notion that nectar chemistry can be decoupled from that of other tissues.

Indexed as

MetabolomePlant NectarPollinationAnimalsBeesFlowersMetabolomicsPhylogenyPlant LeavesSalviaPlant Nectarbeehummingbirdmetabolomicsnectar chemistryplant defenseSalviaspecialized metabolites

Identifiers

PMID40365744
PMCPMC12177308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.