ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
Toward Uncertainty-Aware Hemolysis Modeling: A Universal Approach to Address Experimental Variance.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Early Models to Emerging Trends: The Evolution of Computational Hemolysis Prediction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Pediatric Versus Adult Shear-Induced Hemolysis: Are Age-Related Blood Properties the Main Cause for Differences?Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Quantifying Experimental Variability in Shear-Induced Hemolysis to Support Uncertainty-Aware Hemolysis Models.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to address the lack of uncertainty quantification in numerical hemolysis models, which are critical for medical device evaluations. Specifically, we aim to develop a probabilistic hemolysis model, which incorporates experimental variability using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to enhance predictive accuracy and robustness. Initially, we examined the objective function landscape for fitting a Power Law hemolysis model, whose parameters are derived from inherently uncertain experimental data, by employing a grid search approach. Building on this, we applied MCMC to derive detailed stochastic distributions for the hemolysis Power Law model parameters C, α, and β. These distributions were then propagated through a reduced order model of the FDA benchmark pump to quantify the experimental uncertainty in hemolysis measurements with respect to the predicted pump hemolysis. Our analysis revealed a global flat minimum in the objective function landscape of the multi-parameter power law model, a phenomenon attributable to fundamental mathematical limitations in the fitting process. The probabilistic hemolysis model converged to a constant optimal C = 3.515 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.