Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365720›Full record

ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2025

Influence of Three Combinations of Cryoprotectants and Two Warming Temperatures on Cellular Morphology, Morphometry and Mitochondrial Activity of Vitrified Canine Testicles.

Juliana de Souza Fernandes, Jéssyka Araújo Noronha, Francisco Denilson Rodrigues Gomes, Bruna Farias Brito, Gisele Karla Sena Guimarães, Herlon Victor Rodrigues Silva, Leda Maria Costa Pereira Bersano, Lúcia Daniel Machado da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juliana de Souza FernandesLaboratório de Reprodução de Carnívoros (LRC), Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Jéssyka Araújo NoronhaLaboratório de Reprodução de Carnívoros (LRC), Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Francisco Denilson Rodrigues GomesLaboratório de Manipulação de Oócitos e Folículos Ovarianos Pré-Antrais (LAMOFOPA), Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Bruna Farias BritoCentro Universitário Fametro (UNIFAMETRO), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Gisele Karla Sena GuimarãesLaboratório de Reprodução de Carnívoros (LRC), Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Herlon Victor Rodrigues SilvaLaboratório de Reprodução de Carnívoros (LRC), Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Leda Maria Costa Pereira BersanoLaboratório de Reprodução de Carnívoros (LRC), Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Lúcia Daniel Machado da SilvaLaboratório de Reprodução de Carnívoros (LRC), Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-1968

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306749/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High concentrations of cryoprotectants required for testicular vitrification result in a toxic environment for cells. To mitigate this issue, a suitable alternative is to combine cryoprotectants. The temperature for warming a vitrified sample is also important to assure cell viability. Thus, the aim of this work was to evaluate how combining cryoprotectants (ethylene glycol-EG, glycerol-GLY, and dimethyl sulfoxide-DMSO) in pairs and using two warming temperatures (37°C and 50°C) influence cellular morphology, tubular morphometry, and mitochondrial activity after testicular vitrification of dogs. Testicular fragments from ten adult dogs were distributed among the fresh control group (CTR) and the experimental groups according to the combination of cryoprotectants and temperatures (EG/GLY37, EG/GLY50, DMSO/GLY37, DMSO/GLY50, DMSO/EG37 and DMSO/EG50). The fragments were vitrified in a final concentration of 5.6 mol/L (2.8 mol/L of each of the cryoprotectants combined two by two) and subsequently warmed up to 37°C/30 s or 50°C/5 s. Following this, they were processed for histomorphological, morphometric, and mitochondrial activity evaluations with Rhodamine 123. In the morphometric evaluation, all vitrified groups showed a significant reduction in tubular diameter (p < 0.05). All experimental groups showed greater basement membrane separation when related to the CTR (p < 0.05). DMSO/EG37 showed the greatest basement membrane separation when compared to all other groups (p < 0.05). Regarding membrane retraction, all vitrified groups, regardless of the warming temperature, had greater retraction when related to CTR (p < 0.05), except DMSO/GLY50, which did not differ from any group (p > 0.05). Regarding the distinction between spermatogonia and Sertoli cells, no groups warmed up to 50°C differed from the control, except DMSO/GLY37. For nuclear visualisation, none of the vitrified groups differed from the CTR (p > 0.05), except DMSO/GLY37 (p < 0.05), which showed better nuclear visualisation. For the nuclear condensation parameter, there were no significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). Mitochondrial activity was reduced in all vitrified samples, regardless of the combination of cryoprotectants and warming temperature (p > 0.05). It was concluded that the association of DMSO/GLY50 presented better preservation of morphological aspects.

Indexed as

CryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsTestisAnimalsDimethyl SulfoxideDogsEthylene GlycolGlycerolHot TemperatureMaleMitochondriaSemen PreservationVitrificationCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideEthylene GlycolGlycerolcryopreservationdimethyl sulfoxideethylene glycolglycerolmale gonad

Identifiers

PMID40365720
PMCPMC12076270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.