ArticleGenetics2025
Conflicting Kinesin-14s in a single chromosomal drive haplotype.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Higher order repeat structures reflect diverging evolutionary paths in maize centromeres and knobs.Genome biology · 2026Article
- The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genetic and environmental influences on the distributions of three chromosomal drive haplotypes in maize.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In maize, there are 2 meiotic drive systems that target large heterochromatic knobs composed of tandem repeats known as knob180 and TR-1. The first meiotic drive haplotype, abnormal chromosome 10 (Ab10) confers strong meiotic drive (∼75% transmission as a heterozygote) and encodes 2 kinesins: KINDR, which associates with knob180 repeats, and TRKIN, which associates with TR-1 repeats. Prior data show that meiotic drive is conferred primarily by the KINDR/knob180 system while the TRKIN/TR-1 system seems to have little or no role, making it unclear why Trkin has been maintained in Ab10 haplotypes. The second meiotic drive haplotype, K10L2, confers a low level of meiotic drive (∼51-52%) and only encodes the TRKIN/TR-1 system. Here, we used long-read sequencing to assemble the K10L2 haplotype and showed that it has strong homology to an internal portion of the Ab10 haplotype. We also carried out CRISPR mutagenesis to test the role of Trkin on Ab10 and K10L2. The data indicate that the Trkin gene on Ab10 does not improve drive or fitness but instead has a weak deleterious effect when paired with a normal chromosome 10. The deleterious effect is more severe when Ab10 is paired with K10L2: in this context, functional Trkin on either chromosome nearly abolishes Ab10 drive. Mathematical modeling based on the empirical data suggests that Trkin is unlikely to persist on Ab10. We conclude that Trkin either confers an advantage to Ab10 in untested circumstances or that it is in the process of being purged from the Ab10 population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.