ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2025
Intraventricular pressure difference estimation based on blood speckle tracking-invasive validation and early clinical application.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Late-systolic to early-diastolic hemodynamic force analysis in ischemic heart disease using vector flow mapping and invasive pressure measurement.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-based haemodynamic force trajectories in a murine model of reversible pressure overload.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Echocardiographic Markers of Right Ventricle Diastolic Dysfunction in Neonates and Infants with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Echocardiographic Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Contemporary Review of the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Guidelines and Emerging Modalities.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Speckle tracking technology and investigation of risk factors for premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsVentricular relaxation creates an intraventricular pressure difference (IVPD) and resultant diastolic suction. Non-invasive estimation by echocardiographic techniques would allow to clinically evaluate IVPD as an important component of diastolic functional assessment. The aims of the current study were to evaluate the accuracy of IVPD estimation based on Blood Speckle Tracking (BST) echocardiography compared with invasive pressure measurements and to clinically apply the method in children with univentricular hearts (UVH) and controls. METHODS AND
resultsThe accuracy of BST-based IVPD-estimates was assessed in an open-chest porcine model, comparing BST-based IVPD with simultaneous repeated invasive pressure measurements in six pigs using micromanometer catheters. BST-based IVPD assessment during early diastolic filling was performed in 83 healthy controls and 44 patients with UVH and compared between the groups. The validation in pigs included 103 measurements, demonstrating a mean difference of -0.01 mmHg (P = 0.33) and high correlation (r = 0.95, P value < 0.001) between IVPD from BST (-1.31 ± 0.28 mmHg) and invasive measurements (-1.30 ± 0.31 mmHg). In the paediatric patients, age range 6 months-17.76 years, feasibility was 93.9% in controls and 88.6% in UVH patients. Median IVPD was significantly higher in controls compared with UVH (-1.82 vs. -0.88 mmHg, P < 0.001). Intraclass correlation coefficients for variability of clinical BST-data were 0.99 (interobserver) and 0.98 (intraobserver) respectively.
conclusionBST echocardiography provides accurate estimation of IVPD in early diastole. IVPD was significantly lower in children with UVH compared with controls suggesting lower diastolic suction, which can impact overall filling dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.