ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Brain activity during a cognitive task after consuming food of varying palatability.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been reported that various physiological and psychological changes occur after consuming delicious food. Additionally, research on task performance efficiency following the consumption of delicious food has garnered significant attention. In particular, studies on physiological states have been actively conducted in recent years, with an increasing number of studies utilizing brain activity measurements. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the physiological changes that occur after consuming delicious food by administering a cognitive task, the Stroop task, and measuring brain activity during the task. In this study, two experiments were conducted to better understand the effects of consuming delicious food. Before starting the two experiments, we evaluated the taste of fried rice in a preliminary experiment and selected three types of them (delicious, slightly delicious, and normal) for the main experiment. In Experiment 1, 20 healthy students (19-26 years old, 11 females) were divided into two groups: 10 students in group 1 ate delicious fried rice and 10 students in group 2 ate normal fried rice. One experimental block included recording the EEG, performing the Stroop task, eating the given sample, and answering the questionnaire. Results of data analysis indicated that group 1 was significantly shorter (high work efficiency) than group 2 in terms of task work time. Concerning brain activity, group 1 showed lower theta and alpha amplitudes in the frontal regions (high arousal), and alpha band activity was lower in the left frontal region than in the right region (high approach motivation). In Experiment 2, 28 healthy students were asked to eat delicious fried rice and slightly delicious fried rice on different days. The daily experimental flow was set up as in Experiment 1. Results of data analysis showed that deliciousness and EEG were negatively correlated at theta and alpha band. This study provides novel evidence that eating delicious food increases work efficiency, arousal, and motivation for the task and decreases theta and alpha activities in limited brain regions. The observed neural profiles may enhance attentional states in high-demand occupational settings, while providing preliminary insights into neurophysiological mechanisms that might underlie food-related motivational processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.