Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365615›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Phylogenetic Corrections and Higher-Order Sequence Statistics in Protein Families: The Potts Model vs MSA Transformer.

Kisan Khatri, Ronald M Levy, Allan Haldane

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kisan KhatriDepartment of Physics and Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Ronald M LevyDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Allan HaldaneDepartment of Physics and Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

Funding

Mapping Fitness & Free Energy Landscapes of ProteinsR35GM132090 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Ronald Levy · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
Computer Cluster for Computational Biology and BiophysicsS10OD020095 · OD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LEVY, RONALD · 2015 to 2015
$442k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM132090NIH HHS S10 OD020095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent generative learning models applied to protein multiple sequence alignment (MSA) datasets include simple and interpretable physics-based Potts covariation models and other machine learning models such as MSA-Transformer (MSA-T). The best models accurately reproduce MSA statistics induced by the biophysical constraints within proteins, raising the question of which functional forms best model the underlying physics. The Potts model is usually specified by an effective potential including pairwise residue-residue interaction terms, but it has been suggested that MSA-T can capture the effects induced by effective potentials which include more than pairwise interactions and implicitly account for phylogenetic structure in the MSA. Here we compare the ability of the Potts model and MSA-T to reconstruct higher-order sequence statistics reflecting complex biological sequence constraints. We find that the model performance depends greatly on the treatment of phylogenetic relationships between the sequences, which can induce non-biophysical mutational covariation in MSAs. When using explicit corrections for phylogenetic dependencies, we find the Potts model outperforms MSA-T in detecting epistatic interactions of biophysical origin.

Identifiers

PMID40365615
PMCPMC12073887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.