Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365613›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2025

Understanding the perceptions of risks versus the benefits of COVID-19 vaccinations in Manyara, Tanzania.

Chima E Onuekwe, Violet M Mathenge, Alexander Makulilo, William Mwengee, Tumaini Haonga, Grace Saguti, Charles Sagoe-Moses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chima E OnuekweDepartment of Immunizations, Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR), World Health Organization, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5044-553X
Violet M MathengeDepartment of Immunizations, Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR), World Health Organization, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8776-3208
Alexander MakuliloDepartment of Political Science and Public Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Dar Es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-2269
William MwengeeDepartment of Immunizations, Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR), World Health Organization, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-5985
Tumaini HaongaHealth Promotion Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3516-5430
Grace SagutiEmergency Preparedness and Response (EPR), World Health Organization, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5451-4419
Charles Sagoe-MosesDepartment of Leadership and Management, World Health Organization, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0810-4694

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few would argue that vaccines have not saved more lives than any other medical invention. Eradicating smallpox, reducing wild poliovirus, saving the world from the Ebola virus, and reversing the trend of COVID-19 infections, vaccines are common references in revolutionising global health. These successes were not achieved without varying perceptions of the risks of diseases versus the benefits of vaccination. Aim: The study aimed to assess whether the perceived severity versus benefits of vaccination significantly influenced COVID-19 vaccination. Setting: This study was conducted in the Manyara region, Tanzania. Methods: A cross-sectional study were conducted among adults above 18 years across seven councils of the Manyara region, Tanzania. Forty focus group discussions (FGDs) and 32 key informant interviews (KIIs) generated qualitative data, in contrast to household surveys for quantitative data. Results: Over half, 54.6%, who perceived the COVID-19 vaccine as effective in preventing severe illness or death were vaccinated compared to those who disagreed (45.1%), indicating a strong association between vaccine effectiveness perception and vaccine acceptance or hesitancy ( Conclusion: This study found that perceptions of the severity of risks or benefits of vaccination significantly influenced the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination in Manyara. Contribution: This study underscores the importance of other factors that influence perceptions of risks and benefits of healthcare services even if they were offered at no cost to the beneficiary.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccinehesitancyManyara regionrisk perceptionTanzaniavaccinationvaccine acceptance

Identifiers

PMID40365613
PMCPMC12067590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.