ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2025
Exploring determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Tanzania: A socio-ecological perspective.
Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding the socio-ecological determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A cross-sectional study of post-COVID-19 Tanzania.Journal of public health in Africa · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to challenge global public health, with vaccination playing a key role in mitigating transmission. Despite recognising its importance, Tanzania exhibits considerable regional disparities in vaccine uptake. Understanding the determinants influencing vaccination is essential. Aim: This study investigated determinants of COVID-19 vaccination rates within Tanzania, employing a socio-ecological framework to comprehensively examine individual, interpersonal, community, and institutional influences. Setting: Eight regions across Tanzania, purposively selected to represent urban, peri-urban, and rural contexts, reflecting varying socio-cultural and infrastructural conditions. Methods: A concurrent mixed-method design was utilised, combining quantitative surveys from 3098 participants with qualitative data collected through focus group discussions and key informant interviews. Results: Although general awareness of COVID-19 was notably high (99.3%), overall vaccine acceptance remained low (37.2%), exhibiting significant regional variations (22.5% in Morogoro to 50.0% in Mtwara). Individual factors such as personal vaccine beliefs, perceived safety, and misinformation significantly impacted uptake. Interpersonal influences from family, friends, and community leaders critically shaped vaccination decisions. Despite high acknowledgment of community leaders' roles (88.3%), governmental campaign awareness was minimal (22.4%). Institutional factors, notably healthcare system trust and vaccine accessibility, also significantly influenced uptake. Conclusion: Findings advocate for region-specific, multilevel interventions addressing misinformation, engaging trusted community influencers, improving transparency, and enhancing healthcare service delivery to mitigate disparities and enhance vaccine acceptance. Contribution: The study offers insights foundational for tailored public health strategies, improving vaccine accessibility and resilience against future pandemics in Tanzania and comparable socio-ecological contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.