Elastoplastic fracture behavior of

Qiang Su, Xuejie Ma, Wenhang Liu, Jianchao Zhang, Zhihong Yu, Zhixing Liu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiang SuCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Xuejie MaCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Wenhang LiuCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Jianchao ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Zhihong YuCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Zhixing LiuCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The interaction between Methods: A mechanical model for CKB was established based on its fracture mechanical characteristics. The model incorporates elastoplastic stages, including elastic, elastoplastic, and fully plastic phases during stem crushing. A parameter calibration method was employed, combining physical experiments with simulation experiments to refine the discrete element model. The key binding parameters of the model were optimized to best simulate the mechanical properties of CKB under various loading conditions. Results: The optimal binding parameters for the flexible discrete element model were identified as: normal stiffness of 3.67×10 Discussion: The developed model accurately simulates the elastoplastic fracture behavior of CKB under compression, bending, and shear, providing valuable insights into the crushing mechanism of CKB. The calibration process demonstrated that the proposed DEM model can be an effective tool for exploring and optimizing the crushing process of CKB.

Indexed as

Caragana korshinskii Kom.discrete element flexible modelelastoplastic mechanicsGA-BP-GAmechanical propertiespeak fracture force

Identifiers

PMID40365564

DOI10.3389/fpls.2025.1590054

PMCPMC12069287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.