ArticleBurns & trauma2025
Deployable machine learning-based decision support system for tracheostomy in acute burn patients.
Article in Burns & trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- A predictive formula for the indication of airway management in burn patients.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Management of Burns: Multi-Center Assessment Comparing AI Models and Experienced Plastic Surgeons.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Tracheostomy in the Digital Age: How Artificial Intelligence and Immersive Technologies Are Redefining Airway Care.Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Airway obstruction is a common emergency in acute burns with high mortality. Tracheostomy is the most effective method to keep patency of airway and start mechanical ventilation. However, the indication of tracheostomy is challenging and controversial. We aimed to develop and validate a deployable machine learning (ML)-based decision support system to predict the necessity of tracheostomy for acute burn patients. Methods: We enrolled 1011 burn patients from Southwest Hospital (2018-20) for model development and feature selection. The final model was validated on an independent internal cross-temporal cohort (2021, Results: The optimal model was the eXtreme Gradient Boosting classifier (XGB), which achieved an AUROC of 0.973 and AUPRC of 0.879 in training dataset, and AUROCs of greater than 0.95 in both cross-temporal and cross-institutional validation. Moreover, it kept stable discriminatory ability in validation subgroups stratified by sex, age, burn area, and inhalation injury (AUROC ranging 0.903-0.990). The analysis of calibration curve, decision curve, and score distribution proved the feasibility and reliability of the ML-based nomogram, abbreviated scale (BETS), and online calculator. Conclusions: The developed system has strong predictive ability and generalizability in cross-temporal and cross-institutional evaluations. The nomogram, online calculator, and abbreviated scale based on ML show comparable prediction performance and can be deployed in broader application scenarios, especially in resource-limited clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.