ArticleJournal of cardiovascular and thoracic research2025
Baseline characteristics and seven-year follow-up of patients with coronary slow flow: A cohort study in northeastern Iran.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scores and TIMI Frame Count-Defined Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon in Patients with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Empagliflozin in the Absence of Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Its Anthropometric and Metabolic Effects in Humans and Animals.International journal of endocrinology · 2026Article
- Clinical and angiographic characteristics of very young patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive SNP-based evaluation of fat mass and obesity-associated geneJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An angiographic finding known as "coronary slow flow phenomenon" (CSFP) occurs when there is no discernible stenosis but the contrast flow is slower than usual. Although the prognosis for the majority of CSFP cases is favorable, frequent angina significantly lowers their quality of life. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the potential contributing risk factors and prognostic implications of CSFP on long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, cohort study was conducted between years 2014-2022 and included a total of 65 CSFP patients and 65 controls with normal coronary flow, as evidenced by coronary angiography. These two groups were examined in terms of future cardiovascular consequences due to this phenomenon, baseline demographic characteristics, and laboratory findings. A Results: In this study 130 people including 73 men and 57 women, who because of the typical chest pain and at least a noninvasive test took angiography, were explored. The median triglyceride (200.80±48.51 vs 131.79±34.22, Conclusion: Our research indicated that individuals with CSFP were more likely to develop cardiac events including unstable angina. Furthermore, obesity and dyslipidemia could provoke this phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.