Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365497›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Construction and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cause-specific survival in cervical cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy based on the SEER database.

Yadong Zhang, Liyi Rong, Hairong Jiang, Xin Mu, Hongfu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yadong Zhang *Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Liyi Rong *Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Hairong JiangDepartment of Geriatrics, Jilin City Hospital of Chemical Industry, Jilin City, China.
Xin MuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jilin City Hospital of Chemical Industry, Jilin City, China.
Hongfu ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to construct and validate competitive-risk model nomograms using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to predict the overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) for cervical cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy from 2000 to 2020. Materials: Cervical cancer cases treated with radical radiotherapy in the SEER database were retrieved. Inclusion criteria included the pathological diagnosis of cervical cancer, diagnosis within the specified time frame, and age between 20 and 79 years. Exclusion criteria were the presence of other malignant tumors, cancer-directed surgery, and incomplete data. Variables such as age, diagnosis year, and race were extracted. Patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a 4:1 ratio using a stratified random sampling method. For the training set patients, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed, and CRM nomograms to predict the 3-year and 5-year OS and CSS were created in R. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and a calibration curve were used to assess model performance. Results: A total of 8,810 patients were included for OS and CSS analysis. The median follow-up was 26 months. The median OS was 64.0 months and CSS was 135.0 months. Diagnosis year, marital status, histologic type, chemotherapy, T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor size, median household income, and radiation modality were factors influencing the median survival time of OS and CSS. Age was an independent factor influencing OS. The C-index for OS and CSS predictions were 0.72 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.70 to 0.74] and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.75), respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between nomogram predictions and actual observations. Conclusion: The nomograms can objectively and precisely predict the OS and CSS of cervical cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy.

Indexed as

cause-specific survivalcervical canceroverall survivalradical radiotherapySEER database

Identifiers

PMID40365497
PMCPMC12069064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.