ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Construction and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cause-specific survival in cervical cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy based on the SEER database.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology, outcomes of treatment, and survival of cervical cancer in Kazakhstan: a nationwide population-based study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Modelling Using MRI Radiomic Data in Cervical Cancer Treated with Definitive Chemoradiotherapy and Brachytherapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to construct and validate competitive-risk model nomograms using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to predict the overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) for cervical cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy from 2000 to 2020. Materials: Cervical cancer cases treated with radical radiotherapy in the SEER database were retrieved. Inclusion criteria included the pathological diagnosis of cervical cancer, diagnosis within the specified time frame, and age between 20 and 79 years. Exclusion criteria were the presence of other malignant tumors, cancer-directed surgery, and incomplete data. Variables such as age, diagnosis year, and race were extracted. Patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a 4:1 ratio using a stratified random sampling method. For the training set patients, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed, and CRM nomograms to predict the 3-year and 5-year OS and CSS were created in R. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and a calibration curve were used to assess model performance. Results: A total of 8,810 patients were included for OS and CSS analysis. The median follow-up was 26 months. The median OS was 64.0 months and CSS was 135.0 months. Diagnosis year, marital status, histologic type, chemotherapy, T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor size, median household income, and radiation modality were factors influencing the median survival time of OS and CSS. Age was an independent factor influencing OS. The C-index for OS and CSS predictions were 0.72 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.70 to 0.74] and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.75), respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between nomogram predictions and actual observations. Conclusion: The nomograms can objectively and precisely predict the OS and CSS of cervical cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.