ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Evaluation of the stability of tigecycline in elastomeric infusion devices used for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 2026 Updated good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults and children in the UK.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tigecycline is increasingly being considered in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programmes given its spectrum of activity; however, stability data are lacking, necessitating further study. Objective: To assess tigecycline stability in elastomeric infusers under OPAT conditions, following the UK Yellow Cover Document (YCD) stability testing guidelines. Methods: Tigecycline was reconstituted with normal saline in Leventon Dosi-Fuser and Baxter-LV10 infusers at doses of 50, 100 and 200 mg in 240 mL. Additionally, a tigecycline intermittent infusion dose (50 mg/100 mL) was reconstituted in Baxter-SV100 infusers. The infusers were stored under refrigerated storage (2°C-8°C) for 7 days, followed by exposure at an in-use temperature of 32°C for 24 h, or at 25°C for 2 hours for the intermittent infusion. Stability was evaluated using a stability-indicating assay, pH measurement, subvisible particle count and visual inspection as per the YCD. Results: After 7 days of refrigeration followed by 24 h exposure to 32°C, the mean ± SD percentage of tigecycline remaining was 97.9 ± 0.6, 97.3 ± 0.6 and 95.4 ± 0.8 for the Baxter LV10 devices, and 97.2 ± 0.3, 96.9 ± 0.5 and 95.8 ± 0.8 for Dosi-Fuser devices at the low, intermediate, and high dose levels, respectively. For intermittent infusion in Baxter-SV100 devices, the mean ± SD percentage remaining after 7 days of refrigerated storage followed by 2 h at 25°C was 99.7 ± 0.2. Conclusions: Tigecycline meets the UK YCD criteria of ≤5% degradation limit, indicating its suitability for both intermittent and continuous 24-h infusion in OPAT programs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.