ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A human behavior-based model for respiratory infectious diseases prediction.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The research aims to develop a human behavior-based model to predict respiratory infectious diseases. Methods: This research employs semi-supervised machine learning techniques in conjunction with an RGB-depth camera to collect micro-level data. We employed computational fluid dynamics to simulate the dispersion of virus concentration in outpatient environments. Furthermore, we evaluated the infection risk of respiratory infectious diseases (RIDs) by utilizing a dose-response model. Results: A total of 201,600 behavioral data points were collected. The average interpersonal distance observed during medical procedures was 0.62 meters. The most common facial orientation between patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) was face-to-face, accounting for 30.48% of interactions. The predicted average viral RNA load exposures per second during various medical procedures were as follows: Otoscopy: 0.014314 viral RNA loads/s; Rhinoscopy: 0.014411 viral RNA loads/s; Laryngoscopy: 0.014379 viral RNA loads/s; External auditory canal irrigation: 0.018803 viral RNA loads/s. Simulations of preventive measures indicated that N95 masks reduced the probability of infection to 2.44%, surgical masks to 14.81%, and cotton masks to 36.05%. Conclusion: This research presents an innovative micro-level exposure risk model for respiratory infectious diseases (RIDs), which provides significant insights into the risk of infection. However, it is important to acknowledge certain limitations, including the distinctiveness of the data sources utilized and the insufficient examination of transmission pathways. Subsequent studies should aim to enhance the dataset, fine-tune model parameters, and integrate further transmission pathways to augment both the accuracy and applicability of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.