Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365376›Full record

ArticleHarvard journal of law & technology2024

The Legal Uncertainties of Sociogenomic Polygenic Scores.

Shawneequa Callier, Anya E R Prince

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harvard journal of law & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Principles and Policy Recommendations for Comprehensive Genetic Data Governance.Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shawneequa Callier
Anya E R Prince

Funding

Beyond the Medical: The ELSI of Polygenic Scores for Social TraitsR01HG012402 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CADIGAN, ROSEMARY JEAN, PRINCE, ANYA E.R. · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
Polygenic Risk Scores in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Ethical, Clinical, and Legal ImplicationsR01MH128676 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LAZARO-MUNOZ, GABRIEL, PEREIRA, STACEY · 2021 to 2024
$2.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012402NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomics may increasingly be used to predict associations with social traits through a new field called sociogenomics. This approach includes developing genetic 'scores' to identify associations with individuals' traits like educational attainment, feelings of loneliness, aggressive behavior, and criminality. Companies are already testing embryos to select for some of these traits, and these scores could be adopted by industries and settings beyond commercialized reproductive genetic testing services. The nature of the scores raises concerns about the potential dangers of a passive regulatory approach. Although supporters argue that sociogenomic polygenic scores could help mediate social inequality, there are worries that their implementation into society could be discriminatory and inequitable. Without adequate safeguards, it could have severe consequences for adults using IVF services, students, health insurance beneficiaries, employees, and others in the future. While existing legal structures are in place to regulate medical genetic information, these protections have their own flaws, and further, do not clearly extend to polygenic scores. Policymakers must therefore consider the potential harms of sociogenomic polygenic scores, and how to maximize any benefits.

Identifiers

PMID40365376
PMCPMC12074663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.