ArticleInternational journal of yoga
A Comparison of Muscle Activation between Select Standing and Seated-Equivalent Yoga Poses among Healthy Adults.
Article in International journal of yoga. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine muscle activation during four standing yoga poses and their chair equivalent versions. Methods: The approval was obtained from the university's institutional review board committee. Twenty-six healthy adults, 7 males and 19 females, with an average age of 23.73 ± 1.64 years participated. Surface electromyographic was collected using the Noraxon TeleMyo 2400GT. Electrodes were placed over the muscle bellies of bilateral biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), external obliques (EOs), and the erector spinae (ES) on the side of the nondominant leg. Subjects performed the 8 poses in random order and held each for 10 s with the dominant leg forward for the 3 asymmetrical poses. Results: Results of the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that muscle activation was significantly greater during standing for all muscles except for the right EO during both extended side angle and goddess pose. Similarly, peaceful warrior demonstrated significantly more activation during standing for all muscles except for the left EO. Warrior I only demonstrated significant differences between left RF and left BF with standing having greater activation. Conversely, goddess pose demonstrated more activation of the left EO and left ES during sitting, Discussion: Muscle activation was higher in the legs (BF and RF) during the standing poses, and core activation was higher during the seated poses (EO and ES). Conclusion: This is the first study to compare muscle activation during standing and chair equivalent versions of select yoga poses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.