ArticleSkin health and disease2025
Co-producing a randomized controlled trial on the frequency of bathing in eczema: description of a citizen science approach.
Article in Skin health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eczema is a prevalent, chronic, itchy skin condition that often persists into adulthood and significantly affects the quality of life of patients and their families. With no cure available at present, effective management is crucial. Although important patient priorities related to eczema self-management have been identified, they are rarely the focus of large, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Objectives: To outline the methodology of using a citizen science approach to co-produce an online RCT on the frequency of bathing, to support the self-management of eczema. Methods: The co-production of the trial with patients living with eczema involved research prioritization, intervention development and trial design, all carried out through a series of online meetings and surveys. Results: Co-producing the trial took 9 months, consisting of 13 online meetings (5 to prioritize the topic, 4 to develop the intervention and 4 to design the trial), requiring 39 h of time commitment from members of the public ( Conclusions: This paper provides a useful model for co-producing RCTs with members of the public. It describes the key stages of trial development (prioritization, intervention development, trial design) and contains information on the time and resources required to design trials using this approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.