ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2025
Efficacy and safety of rituximab for membranous nephropathy in adults: a meta-analysis of RCT.
Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Membranous nephropathy (MGN) represents a significant challenge in nephrology, with Rituximab emerging as a potential therapeutic intervention. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, focusing exclusively on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2002 to November 2024. Stringent eligibility criteria were applied, including studies with at least ten participants, with data extracted by two independent reviewers. The meta-analysis utilized fixed and random effects models to assess Rituximab's efficacy and safety across multiple outcome measures. Results: The meta-analysis revealed nuanced findings across different follow-up periods. At 6 months, complete remission rates showed non-significant odds ratios ranging from 2.12 to 2.48. By 12 months, the pooled odds ratio was 0.8085 (95% CI: 0.2238-2.9213), with complete remission rates varying between 13.8% and 19.4%. Notably, at 24 months, the common effects model demonstrated a statistically significant odds ratio of 5.0792 (95% CI: 2.2609-11.4107, p < 0.0001). Proteinuria reduction showed consistent improvement, with a median difference of 4.3225. Adverse event analysis indicated a relatively low risk, with an odds ratio of 0.9706 (95% CI: 0.5781-1.6297). Conclusion: Rituximab demonstrates potential efficacy in treating MGN, with promising long-term outcomes and a favorable adverse event profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.