ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Development, Urdu translation, and validation of a lifestyle modification manual for patients post-total knee replacement.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Development, Urdu translation, and content validation of a manual on lifestyle modifications for individuals post-total knee replacement. Methods: A methodological study design was utilized in which a thorough literature review and a group interview with eight subjects were conducted, which led to the identification of domains and generation of items. The group consisted of 10 patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty and five caregivers. A focal group discussion was conducted to evaluate the overlay and repetition among variable items. Two series of content validation were conducted by four content experts and four untrained individuals in English and Urdu. A revision was conducted for items with scores between 0.70 and 0.79 and retention was conducted for items that scored more than 0.79. Items with a content validity index score of less than 0.70 were omitted from the final set of items. Results: The initial review and focus group interview finalized 53 items in the exercise, education, and diet sections. After the discussion phase, the manual was tailored to 34 items. Content validation reported that the English version of the manual received validation scores of 0.864 and 0.858 for relevance and clarity, respectively. Likewise, the Urdu version of the manual attained Scale-Content Validity Index/Average scores of 0.864 and 0.900, respectively, for these metrics. Conclusion: A 34-item lifestyle modification manual was generated and its content was thoroughly validated to provide detailed guidance and instructions, enabling patients to continue their rehabilitation exercises and lifestyle modifications in the comfort of their own homes. The manual shows strong content validity, particularly for our target population in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.