ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Evaluation of search-enabled pretrained Large Language Models on retrieval tasks for the PubChem database.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Databases are indispensable in biological and biomedical research, hosting vast amounts of structured and unstructured data, facilitating the organization, retrieval, and analysis of complex data. Database access, however, remains a manual, tedious, and sometimes overwhelming, task. The availability of Large Language Models (LLMs) has the potential to play a transformative role in accessing databases. Results: We investigate in this study the current state of using a pretrained, search-enabled LLMs (ChatGPT-4o), for data retrieval from PubChem, a flagship database that plays a critical role in biological and biomedical research. We evaluate eight PubChem access protocols that were previously documented. We develop a methodology for adopting the protocols into an LLM-prompt, where we supplement the prompt with additional context through iterative prompt refinement as needed. To further evaluate the LLM capabilities, we instruct the LLM to perform the retrieval. We quantitatively and qualitatively show that instructing ChatGPT-4o to generate programmatic access is more likely to yield the correct answers. We provide insightful future directions in developing LLMs for database access. Availability and implementation: All text used to prompt ChatGPT-4o is provided in the manuscript.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.