Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365079›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Aerosolized Dornase Alfa (DNase I) for the Treatment of Severe Respiratory Failure in COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Per Åkesson, Lisa Mellhammar, Magnus Rasmussen, Malin Inghammar, Sara Jesperson, Fredrik Månsson, Elin Economou Lundeberg, John Walles, Martin Wallberg, Attila Frigyesi and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Training the Lung, Taming the NETs.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Per ÅkessonDivision of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lisa MellhammarDivision of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7623-0342
Magnus RasmussenDivision of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1588-5473
Malin InghammarDivision of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2995-1312
Sara JespersonClinical Studies Sweden-Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik MånssonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Elin Economou LundebergDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Central Hospital of Kristianstad, Kristianstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6296-2522
John WallesDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Central Hospital of Kristianstad, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Martin WallbergDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Attila FrigyesiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0155-4828
Adam LinderDivision of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-7239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung injury in COVID-19 is characterized by neutrophil invasion and the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). An aberrant NET formation may induce local inflammation and increase sputum viscosity. Inhalation of DNase I (dornase alfa) is a treatment option that degrades NETs in the airways. Previous case series have indicated positive clinical effects of inhaled dornase alfa. Methods: Patients admitted to the hospital with acute COVID-19 and hypoxia (oxygen saturation <90%) were randomly assigned to receive aerosolized dornase alfa twice daily for 5 days or a placebo in addition to standard of care. The primary outcome was discharge from the hospital or an oxygen saturation >93% without respiratory support. Results: In total, 76 patients were randomized. The study was stopped when the Omicron virus variant appeared. The clinical response rate did not differ between patients receiving the active substance and placebo. Secondary outcomes were similar across groups, such as mortality, a new episode of hypoxia, length of stay in the hospital, and adverse events. A subanalysis of patients older or younger than 65 years showed no differences in primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Aerosolized dornase alfa failed to improve hypoxia in hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19. The study was conducted during a time of heterogeneity in viral variants and vaccination status of participants. Whether dornase alfa affects the outcomes in other respiratory infections requires further study.

Indexed as

aerosolized DNase ICOVID-19NETsrespiratory failuresepsis

Identifiers

PMID40365079
PMCPMC12069806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.